- Hollywood ReporterHollywood Reporter1h
- ComingSoon.netComingSoon.net9h
- ComicBook.comComicBook.com1d
- IndiewireIndiewire1d
- IndiewireIndiewire1d
- VarietyVariety1d
- CinemaBlendCinemaBlend1d
- IndiewireIndiewire1d
- Hollywood ReporterHollywood Reporter2d
- Digital TrendsDigital Trends2d
- Hollywood ReporterHollywood Reporter2d
- ComingSoon.netComingSoon.net3d
- Hollywood ReporterHollywood Reporter3d
- Digital TrendsDigital Trends3d
- IndiewireIndiewire3d
- Film ThreatFilm Threat3d
- Hollywood ReporterHollywood Reporter3d
- The WrapThe Wrap3d
- DeadlineDeadline3d
- Hollywood ReporterHollywood Reporter4d
- Hollywood ReporterHollywood Reporter4d
- Page SixPage Six5d
- DeadlineDeadline6d
- MovieWebMovieWeb6d
- VarietyVariety6dNo more articles
Why Don’t Live-Action Disney Remake Sequels Make Money?
ComicBook.comStory by Lisa Laman
scrn logline
Disney's live-action remakes may print money, but their sequels flop hard, leaving the Mouse House to rethink its cash cow strategy.
beat sheet
- Previous Disney live-action remake sequels like 'Alice Through the Looking Glass' and 'Maleficent: Mistress of Evil' bombed badly at the box office, failing to capture the nostalgia and novelty that made their predecessors hits.
- Despite the massive success of its live-action remakes, Disney has largely steered clear of greenlighting further sequels, with the upcoming 'Mufasa: The Lion King' being a rare exception - a sign the studio has learned its lesson about milking these properties too far.
call sheet
Lisa Laman, Glenn Close, Jim Carrey, Emma Stone, Disney, Alice in Wonderland, Mufasa: The Lion King, Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, Alice Through the Looking Glass, 101 Dalmatians, 102 Dalmatians, The Grinch, Aladdin, Mulan, Peter Pan & Wendy, Cruella 2, Inside Out